GX 1+4

From Remeis-Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Also known as: V* V2116 Oph Simbad [1]

Monitoring data: CGRO/BATSE RXTE/ASM Swift/BAT MAXI Fermi/GBM pulsed flux

Coordinates

RA 17h 32m 02.16s Dec -24° 44' 44.2"
RA 263.009000 Dec -24.745611
l 1.9370 b +04.7949

Binary system

Distance estimated between 3 and 15 kpc by [2]. [3] determine a distance of 4.3 kpc.

Orbit

Parameter Value Unit Reference
Porb 1160.8±12.4 days [3]
Tperiastron 2451943±53 JD [3]
a sin i 232.2±6.0 106 km [3]
a sin i 776±20 lt-sec derived from above
e 0.101±0.022 [3]
ωperiastron 168±17 [3]
Mass function 0.371±0.026 Msol [3]

Note: In the past an orbital period of ~304 d has been assumed for this source, based on variations in the pulse period of the neutron star (see, e.g., [4]).

Optical Companion

Names: V2116Oph, 2MASS J17320215-2444442
Cool, low- to intermediate-mass, first-ascent giant or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star ([3]).

Parameter Value Unit Reference
Mass <1.22 Msol [3]
K ~8 mag [3]

Available data

  • ASCA: 41ksec GIS exposure (Sep 1994)
  • RXTE: many monitorings 1996-1997 and 2001-2002, mostly individual obs <3ksec, 1996 up to 50ksec
  • Chandra: ACIS-s observations 20ksec and 57ksec (Apr and Aug 2002)
  • XMM Newton: slew data only (detected as XMMSL1 J173202.0-244446 with 14cts/sec)
  • BeppoSAX: ~210ksec awarded in AO1 and AO4
  • INTEGRAL: frequent monitoring as part of Galactic Centre observations
  • Swift: 55ksec XRT exposure (Feb 2006)
  • Suzaku: 100ksec observation Okt 2010?

Description

GX 1+4 is the prototype of the small but growing subclass of accreting X-ray pulsars called Symbiotic X-ray Binaries (SyXB), by analogy with symbiotic stars, in which a white dwarf accretes from the wind of a M-type giant companion.

Gx1 4 pspinevolution.png

The system was discovered in 1970 by a balloon X-ray observation at energies above 15 keV showing pulsations with a period of about two minutes ([1]). In the following years it was one of the brightest X-ray sources in the Galactic centre region during the 1970's, spinning up strongly.

Following an extended low state in the early 1980’s it has been generally spinning down strongly, increasing its pulse period by ~50% over the last 30 years ([5]).

Currently, there is no well established value of the magnetic field of GX 1+4. Assuming standard accretion disk theory (e.g., [6], [7]), the magnetic field has been estimated to be B ∼1013 − 1014 G by different authors (e.g., [8], [9], [10]), which would be among the largest measured for any accreting X-ray pulsar. On the other hand, [11] and [12] find weak evidence for possible CRSFs in in the X-ray spectra which would point to a value of B ∼1012 G for the magnetic field, i.e., 1-2 orders of magnitude lower.

Flux

GX 1+4 is a persistent source, but with strong, irregular flux variations on various timescales (Swift/BAT lightcurve).

Spectrum

The observed spectrum of GX 1+4 can be described by a typical accreting X-ray pulsar spectrum, i.e., a cut-off power law or a comptonization model, always showing also strong intrinsic absorption and an iron line. But it is one of the hardest spectra found among all X-ray binary pulsars. Using the correlation between magnetic field strength and spectral hardness observed in various sources (e.g., [13]) this would indicate a magnetic field in excess of 1013 G.

Pulse Profile

At first approximation the pulse profiles for GX 1+4 display a single broad peak at all energies (see, e.g., [14]). The detailed shape is variable and frequently displays substructure indicative of a superposition of two peaks (see, e.g., [12]).

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lewin, W. H. G., Ricker, G. R., & McClintock, J. E. 1971, ApJ, 169, L17 (NASA ADS)
  2. Chakrabarty & Roche, 1997, Apj 489, 254 (NASA ADS)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Hinkle, K. H., Fekel, F. C., Joyce, R. R., et al., 2006, ApJ, 641, 479 (NASA ADS)
  4. Pereira, M.G., Braga, J., Jablonski, F., 1999, ApJ 526, L105 (NASA ADS)
  5. González-Galán, A., Kuulkers, E., Kretschmar, P., et al., 2012, A&A, 537, A66 (| NASA ADS)
  6. Ghosh, P. & Lamb, F.K., 1979, ApJ, 232, 259 (NASA ADS)
  7. Ghosh, P. & Lamb, F.K., 1979, ApJ, 234, 296 (NASA ADS)
  8. Dotani, T., Kii, T., Nagase, F., et al. 1989, PASJ, 41, 427 (NASA ADS)
  9. Mony, B., Kendziorra, E., Maisack, M., et al. 1991, A&A, 247, 405 (NASA ADS)
  10. Cui, W. & Smith, B. 2004, ApJ, 602, 320 (NASA ADS)
  11. Rea, N., Stella, L., Israel, G. L., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1229 (NASA ADS)
  12. 12.0 12.1 Ferrigno, C., Segreto, A., Santangelo, A., et al. 2007, A&A, 462, 995 (NASA ADS)
  13. Coburn, W., Heindl, W.A., Rothschild, R.E., et al., 2002, ApJ, 580, 394 (NASA ADS)
  14. Naik, S., Paul, B., & Callanan, P. J. 2005, ApJ, 618, 866 (NASA ADS)