RELXILL is a brand new model, joining forces of the XILLVER reflection code (link; Garcia et al., 2010, 2011, 2013) and the RELLINE code (Dauser et al., 2010, 2013). The striking new feature is that for each point on the disk the proper xillver-reflection spectrum is chosen for each relativistically calculated emission angle. The implications of this improvement and more details regarding the model are provided in Garcia & Dauser et al. (2014, ApJ, 782, 76) and Dauser & Garcia et al. (2014, MNRAS, 444, L100). See also this pdf for a short information on all models and their parameters. A full list of changes of previous versions can be found here.
v0.3a: New major version of the relxill model. The biggest change is that the normalization is now defined in a different way, namely directly following the xillver normalization and accounting properly for the reflection fraction. Additionally, the value of the reflection fraction for the lamp post geometry is now more accurately determined, by also taking the boosting of the primary radiation into account. The xillver table has changed as well, allowing now to fit the photon index down to gamma = 1. In addition to these substantial changes a few minor bug fixes have been applied.
By installing the new RELXILL model, all previous implementations of the relline-like and relconv-like models are automatically installed, too. These models are completely identical to the ones from the RELLINE installation (hence, no additional installation of relline is necessary to get the previous functionalities).
Usage and ParametersThe RELXILL model now includes by default the irradiating power law source. It's strength can be set by the parameter refl_frac. This reflection fraction is defined as the ratio of photons that hit the disk to those that reach infinity. Due to strong light bending effects, this value can easily be larger than 1. More details can be found in Dauser+2014. Note, that for a negative value of refl_frac, only the reflection compontent will be returned (similar to the pexrav model definition). All information can also be found in this pdf: download
|norm:||defined as the normalization of xillver divided by the ionization parameter|
|refl_frac:||reflection fraction (relxill): calculated between 20 and 40 keV|
|refl_frac:||reflection fraction (relxilllp): calculated directly from the lamp post geometry|
|Ecut:||cutoff energy in keV (the same for the power law and the reflection spectrum)|
|angleon:||0: angle averaging (see below for more information)|
|1: take angles properly into account|
|fixReflFrac:||0: free reflection fraction (determined by the refl_frac parameter)|
|1: fix reflection fraction to the lamp post value (i.e., the parameter refl_frac has NO meaning in this case)|
|2: free, (same as 0:), but now the reflection fraction is displayed on the screen|
The meaning of the parameters is the same as for the separate models (see relline description). The only exception is the additional parameter angleon. If set to 0, the relxill model acts like a simple RELCONV x XILLVER, hence using only the angle averaged reflection spectra and then applying the relativistic smear. However, if set to 1, it acts as described above: For each point on the disk the proper xillver-reflection spectrum is chosen for each relativistically calculated emission angle. Note that due to the relativistic effects the emission angle is generally not equal to the inclination angle and therefore this more complicated approach is necessary. Moreover, as the angular effects are properly treated, no "guess" regarding a limb brightening or darkening law is needed anymore. Hence, unless you really know what you are doing: Leave angleon=1. It is definitely the exacter model (no matter what your chi2 value is telling you)!
To install, please download the following files:
|last changes||in version|
|tables.fits.tgz (warning: 849MB)||2015-10-14||v0.3a|
The installation is similar to the relline model (look here). Note that you can use the environment variable RELLINE_TABLES to point to the complete set of provided tables, including the xillver table.
A Comparison between RELXILL and the angle averaged approach
The code here is still in BETA-test! Please contact me if you find bugs or encounter problems with the model.